<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new RSS crawler and parser for FeedShow</title>
	<link>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/</link>
	<description>FeedShow online feed reader</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on A new RSS crawler and parser for FeedShow by: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>Christopher,
I am ready to consider any service that could improve Feedshow performance. It seems that the &quot;process&quot; you describe can be implemented beside the &quot;basic&quot; crawling I am currently using. 
I could not find more infos on feedflow.com...do you have details ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Christopher,<br />
I am ready to consider any service that could improve Feedshow performance. It seems that the &#8220;process&#8221; you describe can be implemented beside the &#8220;basic&#8221; crawling I am currently using.<br />
I could not find more infos on feedflow.com&#8230;do you have details ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on A new RSS crawler and parser for FeedShow by: christopher baus</title>
		<link>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>Would you consider using a third party to distribute updates to feedshow?  I've been working on Feedflow.com which allows users and developers to subscribe to an update feed.  Instead of crawling all your feeds periodically you just ping our consolidated feed, and we tell you everything that has been updated that you care about.

It might give you more opportunity to focus on the higher level issues with your app.

Cheers,

Christopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Would you consider using a third party to distribute updates to feedshow?  I&#8217;ve been working on Feedflow.com which allows users and developers to subscribe to an update feed.  Instead of crawling all your feeds periodically you just ping our consolidated feed, and we tell you everything that has been updated that you care about.</p>
	<p>It might give you more opportunity to focus on the higher level issues with your app.</p>
	<p>Cheers,</p>
	<p>Christopher
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on A new RSS crawler and parser for FeedShow by: FeedShow &#187; Nouveau Crawler et parser RSS en place.</title>
		<link>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.feedshow.com/2006/01/18/a-new-rss-crawler-and-parser-for-feedshow/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>[...] Les prochaines améliorations concerneront l&amp;#8217;interface et consisteront à rendre le lecteur plus facile à utiliser, rapide, robuste, &amp;#8230; (version Anglaise) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Les prochaines améliorations concerneront l&#8217;interface et consisteront à rendre le lecteur plus facile à utiliser, rapide, robuste, &#8230; (version Anglaise) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
